<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>StyleCop</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/project/feeds/rss</link><description>StyleCop analyzes C&amp;#35; source code to enforce a set of style and consistency rules. It can be run from inside of Visual Studio or integrated into an MSBuild project.</description><item><title>Updated Release: 4.7 (Jan 05, 2012)</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/releases/view/79972</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;Compatible with the Visual Studio 11 Preview.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Install order should be :
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;VS10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;VS11&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;R#6.1.1 msi (for VS10)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;R#6.1.1 vsix (for VS11)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;StyleCop 4.7&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;This version is now compatible with R# 5.1 (5.1.3000.12), R# 6.0 (6.0.2202.688), R# 6.1 (6.1.37.86) and R# 6.1.1 (6.1.1000.82).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are the bug details for &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Fixed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=4.7&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;fixed in 4.7&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Closed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=4.7&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;closed in 4.7&lt;/a&gt; issues (over 100 issues fixed since 4.6)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are the bug details for all issues since 4.3.3.0 that have been  &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Fixed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=All&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;fixed&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Closed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=All&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;closed&lt;/a&gt; (over 450 fixes).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Release Notes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2 new rules in 4.7.21
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;SA1214:StaticReadonlyElementsMustAppearBeforeStaticNonReadonlyElements&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
Validates that all static readonly elements are placed before all static non-readonly elements of the same type.
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;SA1215:InstanceReadonlyElementsMustAppearBeforeInstanceNonReadonlyElements&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
Validates that all non-static readonly elements are placed before non-static non-readonly elements of the same type.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="ClearBoth"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:56:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Updated Release: 4.7 (Jan 05, 2012) 20120517015655P</guid></item><item><title>Released: 4.7 (Jan 05, 2012)</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/releases/view/79972</link><description>
&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;Compatible with the Visual Studio 11 Preview.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Install order should be :
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;VS10 &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;VS11 &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;R#6.1.1 msi (for VS10) &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;R#6.1.1 vsix (for VS11) &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;StyleCop 4.7&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This version is now compatible with R# 5.1 (5.1.3000.12), R# 6.0 (6.0.2202.688), R# 6.1 (6.1.37.86) and R# 6.1.1 (6.1.1000.82).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here are the bug details for &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;status=Fixed&amp;type=All&amp;priority=All&amp;release=4.7&amp;assignedTo=All&amp;component=All&amp;sortField=Id&amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;page=0"&gt;
fixed in 4.7&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;status=Closed&amp;type=All&amp;priority=All&amp;release=4.7&amp;assignedTo=All&amp;component=All&amp;sortField=Id&amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;page=0"&gt;
closed in 4.7&lt;/a&gt; issues (over 100 issues fixed since 4.6)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here are the bug details for all issues since 4.3.3.0 that have been &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;status=Fixed&amp;type=All&amp;priority=All&amp;release=All&amp;assignedTo=All&amp;component=All&amp;sortField=Id&amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;page=0"&gt;
fixed&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;status=Closed&amp;type=All&amp;priority=All&amp;release=All&amp;assignedTo=All&amp;component=All&amp;sortField=Id&amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;page=0"&gt;
closed&lt;/a&gt; (over 450 fixes).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Release Notes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
2 new rules in 4.7.21
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;SA1214:StaticReadonlyElementsMustAppearBeforeStaticNonReadonlyElements&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
Validates that all static readonly elements are placed before all static non-readonly elements of the same type.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;SA1215:InstanceReadonlyElementsMustAppearBeforeInstanceNonReadonlyElements&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
Validates that all non-static readonly elements are placed before non-static non-readonly elements of the same type.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><author></author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:56:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Released: 4.7 (Jan 05, 2012) 20120517015655P</guid></item><item><title>Updated Release: 4.7 (Jan 05, 2012)</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/releases/view/79972</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;Compatible with the Visual Studio 11 Preview.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Install order should be :
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;VS10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;VS11&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;R#6.1.1 msi (for VS10)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;R#6.1.1 vsix (for VS11)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;StyleCop 4.7&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;This version is now compatible with R# 5.1 (5.1.3000.12), R# 6.0 (6.0.2202.688), R# 6.1 (6.1.37.86) and R# 6.1.1 (6.1.1000.82).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are the bug details for &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Fixed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=4.7&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;fixed in 4.7&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Closed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=4.7&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;closed in 4.7&lt;/a&gt; issues (over 100 issues fixed since 4.6)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are the bug details for all issues since 4.3.3.0 that have been  &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Fixed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=All&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;fixed&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href="http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/list/advanced?keyword=&amp;amp;status=Closed&amp;amp;type=All&amp;amp;priority=All&amp;amp;release=All&amp;amp;assignedTo=All&amp;amp;component=All&amp;amp;sortField=Id&amp;amp;sortDirection=Ascending&amp;amp;page=0"&gt;closed&lt;/a&gt; (over 450 fixes).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Release Notes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2 new rules in 4.7.21
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;SA1214:StaticReadonlyElementsMustAppearBeforeStaticNonReadonlyElements&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
Validates that all static readonly elements are placed before all static non-readonly elements of the same type.
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;SA1215:InstanceReadonlyElementsMustAppearBeforeInstanceNonReadonlyElements&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
Validates that all non-static readonly elements are placed before non-static non-readonly elements of the same type.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="ClearBoth"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:55:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Updated Release: 4.7 (Jan 05, 2012) 20120517015548P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/356088</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fixed in checkin&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;07f64ec59887&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:47:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility 20120517014755P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/356088</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Removing support for VS2008 was not my intention. I'm rolling this back now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:52:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility 20120517105247A</guid></item><item><title>Edited Issue: Add method header adds duplicate references to custom exceptions thrown in the method [7259]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7259</link><description>When I click on StyleCop icon next to a method with no help header, it creates some text using a header template. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This works marvelously with the exception of methods where I throw custom exceptions. If I throw the same custom exception on a number of lines, each throwing of the exception adds a new reference to this exception in the header text. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would it be possible to add only one reference to each custom exception, pls&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:19:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Issue: Add method header adds duplicate references to custom exceptions thrown in the method [7259] 20120517101913A</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Crash Visual studio while writing #region [7260]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7260</link><description>Today i am update to 4.7.22.0. When i try write &amp;#35;region block or cut existing block, VS crashes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NullReferenceException here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#9;StyleCop.ReSharper610.dll&amp;#33;StyleCop.ReSharper610.Core.StyleCopRunnerInt.OnViolationEncountered&amp;#40;object sender, StyleCop.ViolationEventArgs e&amp;#41; &amp;#43; 0x25 bytes&amp;#9;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Duplicate of 7258</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:36:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Crash Visual studio while writing #region [7260] 20120517083645A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Visual Studio Crashing following recent upgrade to 4.7.22.0</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/355984</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:35:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Visual Studio Crashing following recent upgrade to 4.7.22.0 20120517083553A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Visual Studio crashed with 4.7.22</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/356123</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just downloaded and installed latest version 4.7.22. After solution is loaded and resharper starts to analyze file, VS crashed. Resharper version is 6.1.37.86 (Public 6.1 AFAIK). For now, I just disabled StyleCop in resharper and it works. But I want them  work together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previous version was 4.7.17 and it was working fine. Am I alone with this problem?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>shtin</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:23:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Visual Studio crashed with 4.7.22 20120517082356A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Crash Visual studio while writing #region [7260]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7260</link><description>Today i am update to 4.7.22.0. When i try write &amp;#35;region block or cut existing block, VS crashes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NullReferenceException here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#9;StyleCop.ReSharper610.dll&amp;#33;StyleCop.ReSharper610.Core.StyleCopRunnerInt.OnViolationEncountered&amp;#40;object sender, StyleCop.ViolationEventArgs e&amp;#41; &amp;#43; 0x25 bytes&amp;#9;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Same bug opened yesterday. Upgrade to r&amp;#35; 6.1.1 and reinstall stylecop or wait for 4.7.23</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:56:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Crash Visual studio while writing #region [7260] 20120517075641A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Crash Visual studio while writing #region [7260]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7260</link><description>Today i am update to 4.7.22.0. When i try write &amp;#35;region block or cut existing block, VS crashes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NullReferenceException here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#9;StyleCop.ReSharper610.dll&amp;#33;StyleCop.ReSharper610.Core.StyleCopRunnerInt.OnViolationEncountered&amp;#40;object sender, StyleCop.ViolationEventArgs e&amp;#41; &amp;#43; 0x25 bytes&amp;#9;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>devi_ous</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:42:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Crash Visual studio while writing #region [7260] 20120517074216A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Command Line Options</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/223085</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is also an article describing how to make such console app by your own:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://stylecopplus.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Running%20StyleCop%20from%20Your%20Code"&gt;http://stylecopplus.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Running%20StyleCop%20from%20Your%20Code&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Oleg Shuruev&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>shuruev</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:30:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Command Line Options 20120517073015A</guid></item><item><title>Edited Issue: Add method header adds duplicate references to custom exceptions thrown in the method [7259]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7259</link><description>When I click on StyleCop icon next to a method with no help header, it creates some text using a header template. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This works marvelously with the exception of methods where I throw custom exceptions. If I throw the same custom exception on a number of lines, each throwing of the exception adds a new reference to this exception in the header text. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would it be possible to add only one reference to each custom exception, pls&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>jiripik</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:29:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Issue: Add method header adds duplicate references to custom exceptions thrown in the method [7259] 20120517062929A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Add method header adds duplicate references to custom exceptions thrown in the method [7259]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7259</link><description>When I click on StyleCop icon next to a method with no help header, it creates some text using a header template. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This works marvelously with the exception of methods where I throw custom exceptions. If I throw the same custom exception on a number of lines, each throwing of the exception adds a new reference to this exception in the header text. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would it be possible to add only one reference to each custom exception, pls&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>jiripik</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:29:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Add method header adds duplicate references to custom exceptions thrown in the method [7259] 20120517062913A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Feature: Feature Request: Create standard rules for the layout of element documentation [6640]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/6640</link><description>With the right rules this would dramatically improve the readability of doc comments. My suggestion would be to insist on a CRLF before and after the opening element and closing element of many of the tags. For many of the tags insist on a CRLF before the InnerXml starts also.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The following elements to have their opening element and closing element always on a new line&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;code, description, example, exception, include, item, list, listheader, para, param, permission, remarks, returns, seealso, summary, term, typeparam, value.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The following have their innerxml on a new line&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;code, example, exception, item, list, listheader, para, param, permission, remarks, returns, summary, typeparam, value&lt;br /&gt;Comments: I agree with Przemyslaw - Two styles are required.&amp;#10;&amp;#10;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;summary&amp;#62;&amp;#10;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; Sample summary&amp;#10;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;&amp;#47;summary&amp;#62;&amp;#10;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;paramOne&amp;#34;&amp;#62;Sample param one comments.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&amp;#10;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;paramTwo&amp;#34;&amp;#62;Sample param two comments.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&amp;#10;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;returns&amp;#62;Sample return comments.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;returns&amp;#62;</description><author>Tim_S</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:53:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Feature: Feature Request: Create standard rules for the layout of element documentation [6640] 20120517045357A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: R# Naming Style for private fields [7073]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7073</link><description>Please add a setting in the default R&amp;#35; user settings for private static readonly fields to use lower camel case. This will override the R&amp;#35; default setting which uses upper camel case. The setting can be found in ReSharper &amp;#62; Options &amp;#62; Languages &amp;#62; Common &amp;#62; Naming Style. The setting is &amp;#34;Static readonly fields &amp;#40;private&amp;#41;&amp;#34; which should be set to &amp;#34;lowerCamelCase&amp;#34;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also consider other private field settings. In the UserSettings.xml, these will be&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;aaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateStaticReadonly&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;AaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateConstants&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;aaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateInstanceFields&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;aaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateStaticFields&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: From here&amp;#58; http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;stylecop.codeplex.com&amp;#47;releases&amp;#47;view&amp;#47;79972&amp;#35;DownloadId&amp;#61;324788</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:23:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: R# Naming Style for private fields [7073] 20120516112337P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: R# Naming Style for private fields [7073]</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/workitem/7073</link><description>Please add a setting in the default R&amp;#35; user settings for private static readonly fields to use lower camel case. This will override the R&amp;#35; default setting which uses upper camel case. The setting can be found in ReSharper &amp;#62; Options &amp;#62; Languages &amp;#62; Common &amp;#62; Naming Style. The setting is &amp;#34;Static readonly fields &amp;#40;private&amp;#41;&amp;#34; which should be set to &amp;#34;lowerCamelCase&amp;#34;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also consider other private field settings. In the UserSettings.xml, these will be&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;aaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateStaticReadonly&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;AaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateConstants&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;aaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateInstanceFields&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;PredefinedRule Inspect&amp;#61;&amp;#34;False&amp;#34; Prefix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Suffix&amp;#61;&amp;#34;&amp;#34; Style&amp;#61;&amp;#34;aaBb&amp;#34; ElementKind&amp;#61;&amp;#34;PrivateStaticFields&amp;#34; &amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: StyleCop.chm file&amp;#10;&amp;#10;SA1300&amp;#10;SA1303&amp;#10;SA1304&amp;#10;SA1306</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:22:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: R# Naming Style for private fields [7073] 20120516112250P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/356088</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do have 4.0 installed. Everything works fine under Visual Studio 2010 and MSBuild 4.0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm working on a project that targets both 3.5 and 4.0. I don't do full builds until I'm about to release, and primarily work in the 4.0 environment. That's why I didn't discover the issue immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, it appears as if you can't import 4.0 DLLs into MSBuild 3.5 build scripts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>chadb</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:59:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility 20120516105937P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/356088</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I changed the dlls to target framework 4 instead of 3.5. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;But if you have 4.0 framework installed it should work fine. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Or so I thought. :-)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Do you have 4.0 installed?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div&gt;~A.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
On 16 May 2012, at 23:24, chadb &amp;lt;&lt;a href="mailto:notifications@codeplex.com"&gt;notifications@codeplex.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; wrote:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;blockquote type="cite"&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From: chadb&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div id="ThreadNotificationPostBody"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First off, thanks for the hard work on release 4.7.22 so quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure which update (but I believe it is somewhere after 4.7.19) broke it, but Visual Studio 2008 is now reporting errors loading StyleCop.dll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More specifically, MSBuild v3.5 can't load something:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;The &amp;quot;StyleCopTask&amp;quot; task could not be loaded from the assembly C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\..\StyleCop 4.7\StyleCop.dll. Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Program Files (x86)\StyleCop 4.7\StyleCop.dll' or one of its dependencies. This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded. Confirm that the  declaration is correct, and that the assembly and all its dependencies are available.&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is: is building StyleCop using a newer runtime intentional (i.e., is Visual Studio 2008 support being deprecated)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andyr</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:54:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility 20120516105408P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility</title><link>http://stylecop.codeplex.com/discussions/356088</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First off, thanks for the hard work on release 4.7.22 so quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure which update (but I believe it is somewhere after 4.7.19) broke it, but Visual Studio 2008 is now reporting errors loading StyleCop.dll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More specifically, MSBuild v3.5 can't load something:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;The &amp;quot;StyleCopTask&amp;quot; task could not be loaded from the assembly C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\..\StyleCop 4.7\StyleCop.dll. Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Program Files (x86)\StyleCop 4.7\StyleCop.dll' or one of its dependencies. This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded. Confirm that the  declaration is correct, and that the assembly and all its dependencies are available.&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is: is building StyleCop using a newer runtime intentional (i.e., is Visual Studio 2008 support being deprecated)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>chadb</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:24:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Visual Studio 2008 Compatibility 20120516102419P</guid></item></channel></rss>
